Forced to allow employees wear BLM symbol? Whole Foods fears of jeopardizing its First Amendment rights

United States – Amazon owned grocery chain of United States, Whole Foods Market has filed a petition in US court claiming that the government is pushing it to violate the constitutional rights. The Whole Foods have made the allegation over being forced to allow its employees to wear Black Lives Matter insignia while on the job, citing that by doing so US government is violating its First Amendment rights.

The claim was made by Whole Foods’ lawyers in filing done on December 17 while responding to claims by National Labor Relations Board that the company was illegally prohibiting its employees from wearing masks with signage ‘Black Lives Matter’ on job. Whole Foods has accused NLRB’s general counsel, Jennifer Abruzzo in the court filing of trying to violate First Amendment rights of the company by attempting to “compel”. The filing said, “By singling out the phrase ‘Black Lives Matter’ the General Counsel is impermissibly favoring, and requiring that WFM favor, certain expressions of political speech over others in its retail grocery stores.”

Related Posts

“The General Counsel seeks to compel employer speech by WFM in violation of the WFM’s rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, and enforcement of any Order from the Board to compel such speech would violate the Constitution,” the filing added.

Whole Foods spokesperson has said that the company’s dress code policy has been designed “to ensure we are giving Team Members a workplace and customers a shopping experience focused entirely on excellent service and high-quality food.” The spokesperson of WFM further said, “We do not believe we should compromise that experience by introducing any messages on uniforms, regardless of the content, that shift the focus away from our mission.”

A group of employees had sued the WFM in July 2020 claiming that they were prohibited from wearing BLM masks at work and were also threatened with termination by company if they didn’t follow the regulations. The lawsuit mentioned the employees had “commonly worn Pride flags in support of their LGBTQ+ coworkers without being disciplined by Whole Foods” and that the company’s “selective enforcement of its dress code constitutes unlawful discrimination.”

Ayswarya Murthy

Ayswarya Murthy is a political journalist. She came to writing through an interest in politics.

Recent Posts

Burnout by 23: Why Young Workers Are Hitting the Wall Earlier Than Ever

Young workers burnout has emerged as a serious workplace crisis, with many professionals feeling exhausted before their careers truly begin.…

January 20, 2026

How to Claim a Federal Income Tax Return in the US: Step-by-Step Guide for 2026

The knowledge of how to file a Federal Income tax return in the US is crucial to all individuals who…

January 20, 2026

Is Being “Always Available” the New Face of Wage Theft in Modern Workplaces?

The modern-day working environment has become a constantly connected one, where workers are likely to receive calls, email messages, and…

January 20, 2026

The Invasion of the South: How Saudi-Backed Escalation is Fueling Chaos

For years, the international community has been fed a narrative of “legitimacy” and “security operations” regarding the presence of northern…

January 20, 2026

US Tech Sector Layoffs Hit 15,000 in January as AI Restructuring Accelerates

The year has begun with a stark reality check for the technology industry, as US tech sector layoffs surged past…

January 19, 2026

The most cited statistic at the WEF opening today is from the Future of Jobs 2025 report: “39% of current workforce skills will be obsolete by 2030”

The world of work is on the edge of a historic revolution, with artificial intelligence, geo-economics and green energy change…

January 19, 2026

This website uses cookies.

Read More