UN human rights experts denounce Texas abortion law as violation of international law

Last updated on July 8th, 2022 at 11:41 am

United Nations human rights monitors have condemned the controversial Texas abortion law as a violation of international law. UN experts called that the newly imposed restrictions on abortion procedure after a fetal heartbeat is detected “profoundly discriminatory and dangerous.” A fetal heartbeat is generally detected by the sixth week of pregnancy.

Speaking with The Guardian, Melissa Upreti, the chairwoman of UN’s working group on discrimination against women and girls, criticized the new Texas law as a violation of various rights guaranteed under international law. She said that the law represents “structured sex and gender-based discrimination at its worst.”

“Unsafe for women”

Upreti added the new law will make abortion unsafe and deadly for women and girls in the state. It will further push abortion providers to take their services underground, resulting in more women opting unsafe procedures to terminate their pregnancies.

Texas law (SB8) endangers women with unprecedented obstacles to safe abortion in nearly all cases. New forms of pressuring those who uphold sexual and reproductive health & rights, including service providers, are a serious concern,” UN Human Rights wrote on Twitter.

Also Read: Izabela Sajbor’s family blames Poland’s strict abortion law for her death

Referred to as “fetal heartbeat bill“, the controversial law came into effect last week after the signing of Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) on the legislation. It prohibits abortions after six weeks of pregnancy and allows private citizens to sue abortion providers in case of any suspicion on breach of new policy. Citizens will be offered at least $10,000 reward for successful lawsuit along with legal fees in specific cases.

Increased risk for vulnerable sections

Reem Alsalem, the UN’s Special Rapporteur on violence against women, denounced the five conservative justices who paved the way for the law to go into effect for jeopardizing the protection of women’s reproductive rights and exposing them and abortion service providers at heightened risk of violence.

Through this decision the Supreme Court of the United States has chosen to trample on the protection of women’s reproductive rights, thereby exposing them and abortion service providers to more violence,” she said, as quoted by media reports.

She further expressed concerns over increased negative implications of the law on women of color, those from low-income groups and other vulnerable sections of the society. UN Human Rights experts also expressed that the Supreme Court’s refusal to block the law has taken not only Texas, but the entire country, backward in the eyes of the international community.

Earlier in 2018, the UN Human Rights Committee had called on countries to ensure that measures to regulate voluntary terminations of pregnancy must not result in violation of the right to life of a pregnant woman or girl or her other rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Uttara J Malhotra

Recent Posts

Sydney Airport Ground Staff Recruitment Begins in Mascot

The aviation sector is experiencing a massive surge in travel demand, and the highly anticipated Sydney Airport Ground Staff Recruitment…

March 7, 2026

Riyadh Food Delivery Rider Registration 2026: New Permit Rules for Expats in Al Olaya

All food delivery riders in the Balady platform are required to obtain a permit named Home Delivery Permit in Saudi…

March 7, 2026

Berlin Airport Expansion Hiring 2026: Ground Crew Jobs Opening in Brandenburg

Airport Berlin Brandenburg (BER) prepares 2026 expansion with 500,+ ground crew vacancies in Brandenburg due to growth in Terminal 3…

March 7, 2026

How Gig Workers in London Can Track Weekly Earnings Under New App Transparency Rules

London gig workers (Uber, Deliveroo, Bolt) gained earnings transparency from January 2026 under DSA/DUA Acts and EU-influenced UK guidelines, mandating…

March 7, 2026

The Great Philippine 4-Day Workweek Debate of 2026

In 2026, the Philippines sparked a national debate on the future of work when legislators put in place a four-day…

March 7, 2026

Why Margaret Atwood Says the 2026 Reading Crisis Is a Human Rights Violation

In 2026, in speeches and interviews, Margaret Atwood compares the increasing global restrictions on books and the process of literacy…

March 7, 2026

This website uses cookies.

Read More