why some employers won’t give in to flexibility
Workers also increasingly expect this autonomy to be maintained. According to a July 2022 survey of 13,382 employees worldwide by consulting firm McKinsey & Company, 40% said workplace flexibility was the top motivator for whether they would stay in their position while barely falling behind pay (41%). Lack of flexibility was also a major factor in resigning, with 26% saying it was the main reason for leaving a previous job. Similarly, in a March 2022 Gallup study of more than 140,000 U.S. employees, 54% of fully remote workers and 38% of hybrid workers, said they would look for another job if their company stopped offering remote work options.
However, amid these changing expectations, many companies are still hesitant or unable to meet these requests. In some cases, managers have demanded that their employees return to the workplace full-time to return to pre-pandemic working methods. Instead of giving workers autonomy, some business leaders have increased pay. In many cases, there are reasons why such flexibility is not considered, but the question is whether the situation will change.
Over the past two and a half years, millions of knowledge workers have been able to work remotely productively due to various pandemic-related restrictions. In the midst of Covid-19, many people have found that work can be very different than in a full-time office. They also found that in many cases performance would not be affected.
However, as Covid-19-related restrictions eased, many bosses began demanding that their employees return to work. Some returned to the office on a mixed schedule, others were full-time. This was especially true in industries such as finance, where executives often set deadlines for returning workers to a pre-pandemic structure. A March 2022 Microsoft study found that half of the global business leaders surveyed plan to require full-time in-person work in the future if they haven’t already installed.
Of course, not every company has taken its own line on the issue of flexibility. There have been differences between industries, and there has even been some movement towards autonomy in tougher sectors.
However, in general, the gap will remain. Industries and employers that are flexible and free from years of practice are more likely to give employees autonomy. Changing the architecture of the workplace can be a difficult task that some of these large companies are hesitant or simply unwilling to undertake.
The Trump administration's renewed emphasis on stricter immigration enforcement is already altering the U.S. labor market. New policies, particularly those…
In a shocking turn of events, nearly 50,000 government employees in the state of Madhya Pradesh have been unpaid for…
The three largest food delivery companies DoorDash, Grubhub and Uber Eats reached a settlement with New York City over a…
The Labour government has created controversy by disregarding the recommendation from the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) to grant…
The Canadian government introduced Bill C-2, the Strong Borders Act, in order to strengthen borders and rebuild Canada's asylum system.…
In early June 2025, Microsoft laid off more than 300 employees, the latest round of job cuts as it continues…
This website uses cookies.
Read More