The world of Fashion suffers from Chinese backlash over human rights violations in Xinjiang

Western powers including the United States, the European Union, Canada and Britain issued sanctions on four senior Chinese officials earlier this week, citing human rights abuses in Xinjiang. In response to the move, China not only announced retaliatory sanctions against European and British officials but also fired many western brands in the political crossfire.

China accused the western powers of ganging up against Beijing to call it down over false accusations about human rights abuses against Uyghur Muslim minority group in Xinjiang region. China repeatedly invalidated the accusation stating that the these were training and re-education camps meant to counter extremism.

On Thursday, Chinese state television called for ban of popular global brands including H&M, Zara, Adidas, Nike, and New Balance. Chinese state news agency took to social media and wrote, “For enterprises that touch the bottom line of our country, the response is very clear: don’t buy!”

Related Posts

Fearing the loss of sales as a consequence of Chinese ban, H&M was quick to issue a statement on its social media account, stating that the company “doesn’t represent any political standpoint” and “respects Chinese consumers,” The Swedish company said that it has been working with 350 Chinese manufacturers and make products that “comply with the principles of sustainable development”. To pacify Chinese consumer and political leaders the company emphasised that it was “committed to long-term investment and development in China”.

Fashion brands fear being dragged into the global pressure game being played by major political powers. Besides, China being the only economy to show recovery signs equivalent to pre-pandemic level, the brands don’t want to irk Chinese investors and consumers in order to keep their businesses going. While on the other hand the demand in US and European market still stand pretty grim and weak.

Targeting an array of western brands, the ruling party’s Youth League on Wednesday said “Spreading lies to boycott Xinjiang while wanting to make money in China? Wishful thinking.” Besides, the State-backed news daily, Global Times, also listed out brands including H&M, Adidas, Zara, Nike and New Balance for their “cutting remarks” about Xinjiang cotton. Besides the mass fashion brands, high end brands like Burberry also faced the heat as the company lost its brand ambassador and its signature tartan design was also wiped out from a popular Chinese video game. Following the fashion house’s statement issued last October regarding scratching approval of cotton sourced from Xinjiang, over human rights concerns, the famous Chinese actress Zhou Dongyu terminated her contract with Burberry as the brand’s ambassador. Her agency on Thursday said that she was discontinuing her association with the brand as Burberry had not “clearly and publicly stated its stance on cotton from Xinjiang”.

About WR News Writer

WR News Writer is an engineer turned professionally trained writer who has a strong voice in her writing. She speaks on issues of migrant workers, human rights, and more.

WR News Writer

WR News Writer is an engineer turned professionally trained writer who has a strong voice in her writing. She speaks on issues of migrant workers, human rights, and more.

Recent Posts

Migrant Workers Returning from UAE With Kidney Failure Due to Extreme Temperatures

Over the last few years, newspapers have reported that migrant workers in the UAE and other Gulf countries have come…

December 4, 2025

Philippines OFWs in Israel: Relocation & Trauma Support After 2025 Border Tensions

Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) in Israel have once again found themselves on the frontlines of conflict, caught between their livelihoods…

December 4, 2025

Tea Garden Workers Get Land Rights — How Land Ownership Could Change Labour Justice in Rural India

Decades after decades, tea garden laborers in India have worked and lived in the farms without owning the land the…

December 4, 2025

U.S. Executive Order Against the Muslim Brotherhood Framed as a Global Security Imperative

There has also been a concerted global push on the side of the recent U.S. Executive Order against the Muslim…

December 4, 2025

Why the UN Migration Committee’s 2025 Recommendations Could Transform Migrant-Worker Rights Worldwide

The 2025 recommendations of the UN Migration Committee represent a change in the way governments are being encouraged to treat…

December 4, 2025

From Brick Kilns to Tech Startups: India’s Contract Workers Need Fair Legal Protection

The economic growth of India has been supported by a labor force that is rather silent and unguarded. Millions of…

December 3, 2025

This website uses cookies.

Read More