Colston Statue Case Referred to Court of Appeal over Human Rights Defense

Last updated on May 4th, 2022 at 01:07 pm

United Kingdom – Suella Braverman seeks clarification about using human rights as a defense in criminal damage cases.

The Attorney General’s decision is shocking and should worry everybody who trusts the justice system..

Following the case’s referral to the Court of Appeal, a barrister representing one of the ‘Colston 4’ criticized the Attorney General of “stoking up culture conflicts.”

After the four people convicted of criminal damage for destroying Colston’s statue in Bristol were released in January, Ms. Suella Braverman QC MP said the High Court will offer the right scope of defense against criminal charges originating from protests.

“The Attorney General affirmed that any Court of Appeal ruling will have no effects on the verdict, as it’s a legal matter that is apart from the political factors.” “It is in the public interest to clarify the legal issues issued in such cases in the future,” she said.

“This decision by the Attorney General is highly disappointing and should concern everyone who values the credibility of our justice system,” said Raj Chada, head of criminal defense at Hodge Jones & Allen.

Related Posts

Who are the Colston 4?

Rhian Graham, Milo Ponsford, Sage Willoughby, and Jake Skuse, also known as the “Colston 4,” were accused of illegal damage in connection with the state’s collapsing and dropping in the harbor.

In January, a jury of 12 persons found all four defendants not guilty of criminal damage after an 11-days trial at Bristol Crown Court and two hours, 57 minutes of deliberation.

What are the opinions of Suella Braverman?

Ms Braverman, Attorney General for England and Wales and Advocate General for Northern Ireland, expressed her opinions on this case.

She stated on Wednesday that she has sought the Court of Appeal to clarify the law on whether a person can use a human rights defense in a criminal damage prosecution.

She also requested that the court explore whether juries should be able to determine whether a guilty verdict is a proportional interference with someone’s human rights.

About G.Morrison

Discover the world of workers' rights through the lens of G. Morrison. With a commitment to unbiased reporting, G. Morrison crafts narratives that unveil the human stories behind labor struggles, advocating for a fair and just global workplace.

G.Morrison

Discover the world of workers' rights through the lens of G. Morrison. With a commitment to unbiased reporting, G. Morrison crafts narratives that unveil the human stories behind labor struggles, advocating for a fair and just global workplace.

Recent Posts

Unequal Earnings for Equal Work? Gender Pay Gap Back in Focus

A crowded office at 6 pm. Keyboards still clacking. Pay conversations kept quiet. The gender pay gap sits in that…

December 7, 2025

COSATU at 40: Four Decades of Relentless Struggle for Workers’ Justice

It is more than a celebration to mark COSATU 40 years of existence, it is also a retrospective of four…

December 7, 2025

How Britain Can Rethink Labor Reforms Through Denmark’s Flexible Work Model

In the process of Britain debating labor reforms due to economic uncertainty, increased gig work, and job security, the Denmark…

December 7, 2025

Inside the Hidden Cost of Silence and Why Workers Don’t Report Abuse

Workplace abuse reporting stays low even as incidents rise, and the hidden cost of silence keeps piling up. Employees fear…

December 7, 2025

No More Late-Night Emails Push Grows While Parliament Weighs New Bill

Phones lighting up at 11 pm, that sharp ping cutting through a quiet room, again. The headline in Delhi today…

December 7, 2025

Women’s Night-Shift and Safety Rights

Women who work on the night shift are an essential component of the health care, hospitality, manufacturing, and IT industries…

December 6, 2025

This website uses cookies.

Read More