South Korea court dismisses wartime labour lawsuit against Japanese firms

Last updated on July 8th, 2022 at 11:36 am

The Court of South Korea dismissed a lawsuit filed by 85 victims of wartime forced labour seeking e compensation from 16 Japanese firms. The firm declined to say accepting the case might violate a 1965 treaty under international law. The Seoul Central District Court in Japan said they are also dismissing the suit as it that demands Japanese companies pay each plaintiff about $90,000 for forced labour and withheld compensation during World War II. They target 16 highly influential companies, including Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corp., Nissan Chemical Corp., and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. This decision has brought a lot of anger and frustration to the victims in South Korea as they demand its actions during its 1910-45 rule of Korea closed.

It is not only about monetary funds but another feud that has been surfacing this is about Japan’s euphemism for Korean women as they were forced to work in its wartime brothels. However, the Seoul court comes clean by saying that the 1965 pact covered victims’ right to damages and South Korea was bound by it. Justice Kim Yang-ho mentioned, that going further with this case will only result in breaching international law and will trigger adverse effects globally.

Also Read: Labor laws – Top 5 countries with best labor laws

A lawyer who is also a supporter of the victims of wartime comes forward and asserts that their rights exist and their case is eligible for a trial. Although, judges appear to have ruled differently because it’s a sensitive issue between the two countries.

A South Korean foreign ministry official said the government respected both court rulings and victims’ rights and would pursue efforts “with an open mind” to come up with a reasonable solution acceptable to all sides involved. Japan rejected the 2018 Supreme Court decision, which ordered Nippon Steel to compensate four Korean plaintiffs, saying the issue of wartime compensation was resolved by the 1965 deal.

Ayswarya Murthy

Ayswarya Murthy is a political journalist. She came to writing through an interest in politics.

Recent Posts

Menstrual Leave Compliance Checklist: What Companies Must Implement Before Government Crackdown

With changes in laws regarding the workplace in India, menstrual leave Compliance is emerging as an issue that is making…

April 22, 2026

Zomato & Swiggy Riders Alert: How to Register for the Government-Backed Accident Insurance?

Food delivery riders operating on platforms such as Zomato and Swiggy have to face the risk of accidents on the…

April 22, 2026

French Senate Sparks High-Stakes Debate on the European Council for Fatwa and Research

Recently, the activity of the French senator Nathalie Goulet in the French Senate has raised new discussions regarding the role…

April 22, 2026

Heatwave Compensation in India: The Fight for ‘Right to Cooling’ and Worker Protection Laws in 2026

Increased heat in India has made heatwaves a major challenge to the general health and labour. The call to heatwave…

April 22, 2026

Telangana Transport Crisis: Best Travel Alternatives During TGSRTC Bus Strike

The current strike of Telangana State Road Transport Corporation has caused a crippling effect on mobility in the state. As…

April 22, 2026

EPF Withdrawal Rejection? Common Reasons and How to Fix Them in 2026

The Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) serves as a safety net to many of the salaried employees. However, as you…

April 21, 2026

This website uses cookies.

Read More