California law struck down by Supreme Court, union can’t access workers on growers’ property

WhatsAppWhatsAppFacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterPinterestPinterestRedditRedditGmailGmailShareShare

 In an ideological split the Supreme Court ruled of striking down a California state regulation. This means that union organizers will not be allowed to visit the farm workers on growers’ property as it violates the right of property owners. The ruling was made on Wednesday under 6-3 ratio. “The access regulation grants labor organizations a right to invade the growers’ property,” Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote for all the judges.

The landmark law, which is unique to the US state of California, was passed in 1975 to ensure “peace in agricultural fields between workers and growers”. The law was also the first to recognize collective bargaining rights of farmworkers. It was formed through relentless efforts of César E. Chávez, Dolores Huerta and others. According to the state law, the union organizers were given access to the growers’ property to visit workers up to 3 times a day for “no more than four 30-day periods in a calendar year”, with prior notice. But the state and union organizers argued that the meetings rarely lasted that long or that frequently.

Related Posts

The revoking of this law is latest blow to organized labor in the state. “Today’s decision affirms that one of the most fundamental aspects of property is the right to decide who can and can’t access your property,” said Joshua Thompson, an attorney for the Pacific Legal Foundation who argued the case on behalf of growers contesting the state’s regulation.

Victoria Hassid, who chairs California’s Agricultural Labor Relations Board, called the ruling a big disappointment. “When workers have information about their basic labor rights and are able to organize, they earn higher wages and have better and safer working conditions,” Hassid said.

Chief Justice Roberts, joined by fellow conservatives Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito Jr., Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, said the court’s opinion about property rights led to the decision.

Ayswarya Murthy

Ayswarya Murthy is a political journalist. She came to writing through an interest in politics.

Recent Posts

Quiet Vacation: 37% Millennials dominate this growing workplace trend

The trend of ‘Quiet Quitting’ is bygone, now the employees are eager for ‘Quiet Vacation’, a growing trend among staff…

May 31, 2025

World Leaders call for freedom of detained UN, NGO Staff in Yemen

The series of arbitrary detentions by the Houthi authorities has been under debate among the world leaders and human rights…

May 31, 2025

Ontario Announces Major Labour and Immigration Reforms for August 2025

By August 2025, Ontario is set to implement the major labour and immigration reforms through the proposed ‘Working for Workers…

May 31, 2025

HMRC Uncovers GBP 7.4M in Unpaid Wages – Thousands of UK Workers to Benefit

In a significant act of protecting workers' rights, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have identified over GBP 7.4 million of…

May 30, 2025

P11D Deadline Approaching: What Employers Must Do Before July 6 to Avoid Fines

With a deadline of July 6, employers in the UK are being reminded of their employee benefits reporting obligations or…

May 30, 2025

15th Wage Revision: 6% Basic Pay Hike and Benefits for 1.09 Lakh TN Transport Staff – Know the Details

The government of Tamil Nadu has officially signed the 15th wage revision deal for the 1,09,787 employees of all eight…

May 30, 2025