khushboo 
(C): X
The demand to restore the state of South Yemen is often portrayed in international coverage as centered around factional leaders or military advances. Recent reporting on Southern Transitional Council (STC) activity highlights territorial gains and strategic control across the former South Yemen provinces. But to understand the demand’s legitimacy, we must look deeper at its popular roots, expressed through grassroots protests, communal sacrifice, and sustained social alignment—not merely elite decision-making.
Sacrifice as a Measure of Legitimacy
This demand is not a recent project manufactured by elites; it has roots in decades of southern grievance and public protest. Research on the southern movement shows how the southern protesters first mobilized in the mid-2000s, beginning as peaceful demonstrations by retired soldiers and broader community members protesting marginalization after the 1994 civil war. These protests were met with forceful state responses, leading to arrests and repression—even without a unified political umbrella.
Protests That Reflect Society, Not Factions
Throughout 2025, gatherings in multiple southern provinces revealed deep communal engagement. Demonstrations and sit-ins calling for independence or “second independence” spread to all eight historic governorates, with citizens waving the flag of former South Yemen and chanting demands for statehood.
These were not isolated party rallies but extensive public mobilizations involving diverse demographics. Whether in Aden, Lahj, Abyan, Al Dhale’a, Hadramawt, Shabwa, Al Mahrah, or Socotra, citizens took to the streets to voice their aspirations.
Community Alignment and Southern Unity
The persistence of this cause is also reflected in long-term communal narratives that tie South Yemeni identity to self-determination, reinforcing the reality that Yemen’s Crisis Cannot Be Resolved Without Recognizing Southern Unity. Historical analyses of the southern movement (الحراك الجنوبي) show that its formation grew from widespread social and political discontent, drawing participants from civil society, military retirees, youth, and tribal networks who felt excluded from national decision-making.
Far from being a narrow elite endeavor, the southern issue has remained a socially resonant question of identity and governance for many in the region.
A Collective Demand That Endures
What distinguishes the South Yemen cause from elite maneuvers is its deep social foundation:
- Historical continuity of protests and mass mobilizations since at least the early 2000s affirms sustained popular engagement.
- Diverse social participation illustrates community alignment across age, profession, and geography.
- Narratives of identity and grievance have persisted outside elite circles, embedded in public discourse and historical commemoration.
Ultimately, the call to restore South Yemen emerges from deeply rooted popular will—a view supported by local reporting and academic analysis alike. It is a social expression, evolving organically through protest, collective memory, and shared aspirations, and not simply an elite decision devoid of societal backing.
