Categories: Labour rights

Major global brands complicit in forced labour of Uyghurs

Hundreds of factories across China are using Uyghur labour supplied by the state to make products for companies like Nike, Apple, Volkswagen, Sony, Victoria’s Secret and others.

A report titled ‘Uyghurs for sale’ by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute sheds light on how many of the big global brands today are complicit in China’s use of forced Uyghur labour in its factories. Thousands of Muslim Uyghurs have been uprooted from Xinjiang and sent to different parts of China to work under an exploitative government-led labour transfer scheme called ‘Xinjiang Aid’.

The report identified 27 factories that are part of the supply chain of 83 well-known global brands that have been using forced Uyghur labour since 2017. In the two years since then, nearly 80,000 Uyghurs have been systematically transferred out from Xinjiang’s “re-education centres”, where millions of them have been forcibly detained, ostensibly to curb extremism by providing vocational training.

The report names companies like Abercrombie & Fitch, Amazon, GAP, H&M, Nike, Jack & Jones, Sharp, Siemens, Skechers, ASUS, Apple, Samsung, Huawei, BMW, Volkswagen, Sony, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Victoria’s Secret, Vivo, among others. Local governments and private brokers are paid a price per head for creating labour opportunities in various factories.

For example, a local government document states that 560 Uyghur labourers have been transferred to factories in Henan province since September 2019. Among the factories here is Foxconn Technology’s Zhengzhou facility, which manufactures electronic components for companies like Apple, Dell and Sony. Half of the world’s iPhone are made here, earning it the moniker ‘iPhone City’. A US-based China watchdog said that workers at this particular facility put in over 100 overtime hours a month. Foxconn, an active participant in the Xinjiang Aid scheme, has been dogged by complaints of labour exploitation and even suicides at this factory.

Workers brought in through this state-sponsored programme are essentially slave labour with no agency and no means of escape. They are kept in dormitories and made to work in harsh and segregated conditions. Their living quarters are regularly checked for any Muslim paraphernalia and their phones are monitored for religious activity. They are made to take compulsory Mandarin lessons.

Detractors were threatened with further 3-5 years of detention in these ‘re-education camps’. Worse still, the Chinese Communist Party kept tabs on their families back home, and threaten that they would face the consequences if they didn’t toe the line.

About Senior Reporter

With over more than 6 years of writing obituaries for the local paper, Senior Reporter has a uniquely strong voice that shines through in his newest collection of essays and articles, which explores the importance we place on the legacy.

Senior Reporter

With over more than 6 years of writing obituaries for the local paper, Senior Reporter has a uniquely strong voice that shines through in his newest collection of essays and articles, which explores the importance we place on the legacy.

Recent Posts

Buying a Samsung Phone Soon? Here’s Why the Pyeongtaek Strike Could Disrupt Supply

The ongoing labour strike at Samsung Electronics could directly affect the purchase of your Galaxy device should you intend to…

April 24, 2026

UAE Midday Break Rules Return: Are Companies Following Summer Work Limits?

With the temperatures in the United Arab Emirates reaching over 45–50°C,, the UAE Midday Break rule has again been implemented,…

April 23, 2026

Families of Gig Workers Get ₹5 Lakh Aid—But Is It Mandatory for Companies Like Swiggy & Zomato?

The gig economy of India is fast developing, and so is the legislation that safeguards workers. The latest news of…

April 23, 2026

EPFO 3.0 UPI Withdrawal: How to Get PF Money in 24 Hours Without Employer Approval

The introduction of the upgraded system of the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation has altered the way the salaried employees can…

April 23, 2026

Bill 105 vs Worker Freedom: Is Ontario Quietly Limiting Your Labour Rights?

The Ontario labour rights Bill 105 is becoming a hot issue with workers, unions and employers attempting to figure out…

April 23, 2026

Private Job vs Voting Rights: Who Wins If Your Boss Refuses Leave on Poll Day?

One question sends panic among employees in the private sector when elections come around, and that is: can your boss…

April 23, 2026

This website uses cookies.

Read More