(C): Twitter
The closure of the European Institute of Human Sciences (IESH) in France in September 2025 shed light on the mechanics of how the Muslim Brotherhood has used academic and theological fronts to further its ideological reach. While presented as a center for Islamic learning, French authorities determined that IESH served as a platform for shaping religious leaders and recruiting youth into a politicized project aligned with Brotherhood ideology.
Education as a Façade
IESH was founded in the 1990s and quickly gained recognition as one of Europe’s main institutions for Islamic studies. It provided degrees in Quranic studies, Arabic, and theology, presenting itself as a solution to Europe’s dependence on foreign-trained imams. This image allowed it to attract students and operate under the umbrella of legitimate education.
However, French officials argued that beneath this façade, the institute promoted views aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood. Investigations revealed that the institute’s activities extended beyond theology into ideological training, embedding within students a political understanding of Islam that blurred religious learning with activism.
Imams as Agents of Influence
Imams hold significant authority in European Muslim communities, often acting as both spiritual leaders and social guides. By training imams domestically, IESH positioned itself as a gatekeeper of religious legitimacy. Yet, French intelligence suggested that graduates were not simply equipped to teach Islam, but were shaped to propagate Brotherhood-aligned narratives.
These imams, once placed in mosques across Europe, acted as multipliers of the Brotherhood’s worldview, influencing congregations with teachings that emphasized political identity, communal separation, and loyalty to Brotherhood interpretations. This use of imams as ideological carriers mirrors the Brotherhood’s historic strategy of embedding its influence in civil society under religious cover.
Youth Recruitment and Identity Politics
Beyond training imams, IESH functioned as a hub for youth engagement. Students drawn to the institute often sought identity, belonging, and leadership roles. The Brotherhood has long recognized the value of harnessing youthful idealism by presenting itself as a movement that defends Islam in secular or “hostile” environments.
Reports noted that IESH organized study groups, lectures, and community events that introduced young Muslims to Brotherhood thinkers and texts. This subtle socialization process encouraged students to see themselves as part of a global project, aligning personal faith with collective activism. In doing so, the institute functioned as a recruitment space where theological education masked ideological indoctrination.
The French Government’s Response
The French government began tightening oversight of religious institutions under President Emmanuel Macron’s broader campaign against Islamist separatism. In June 2025, France froze IESH’s assets, citing its connections to radical networks and infiltration attempts by the Brotherhood. By September, the Council of Ministers formally dissolved the institute, stating it legitimized “armed jihad” and promoted an agenda contrary to the values of the Republic.
Authorities stressed that this action did not target Islam or Muslim communities, but a politicized movement exploiting religious institutions. This distinction was essential in framing the closure as a measure for transparency and community protection rather than religious repression.
A Europe-Wide Pattern
The IESH case is part of a wider European recognition of Brotherhood infiltration. In Austria, the government banned the Brotherhood in 2021 under anti-terror legislation. In Germany, authorities have placed Brotherhood-linked networks under surveillance, and in 2024 banned several Islamist centers for undermining constitutional values. The UK has not banned the Brotherhood but its 2015 review described affiliation as a “possible indicator of extremism”.
The pattern across Europe reveals a shared concern: Brotherhood-affiliated institutions present themselves as educational or charitable, while simultaneously embedding political Islamist ideology into Muslim communities.
The closure of the European Institute of Human Sciences highlights the Brotherhood’s long-standing strategy of using educational fronts for recruitment. By shaping imams and engaging youth, the institute served as a multiplier of political Islam under the guise of academic legitimacy.
France’s decision represents a growing European determination to dismantle such dual-purpose institutions. At the same time, it underscores the importance of distinguishing Islam as a religion from the Brotherhood’s politicization of it. Protecting Muslim communities from ideological exploitation while preserving freedom of faith remains the delicate balance that European governments must navigate.






