khushboo 
(C): Unsplash
Flexible jobs are often marketed as the answer to modern workers’ desires for autonomy, better work–life balance, and freedom from the 9–5 grind. Flexibility in many cases, particularly to caregivers, students, and people with disabilities, can be their key open door to employment opportunities that would remain closed by traditional employment. However, in the shadow of the promise there is another ugly thing: an unstable income, not having social protection and facing constant uncertainty regarding the next paycheck. Choice in the precariousness of employing flexibility vests itself as a facade to workers when workers are exposed to risk. This article looks into the ways flexibility in the workplace can undermine livelihood security, the factors that contribute to the unsustainability of such flexibility, and the concepts that should be safeguarded in order to have fair flexibility indeed. For more updates, visit our Work-Life Balance page.
How “Flexible” Work Creates Precarity
Most gig and platform jobs pay workers by task, or hour under the condition of no minimum income. The software and changes in demand can cut profits during the night, and employees cannot afford to plan their rent, bills, and savings. Since they are categorized as independent contractors, several flexible workers do not enjoy the basic amenities such as paid leaves, health insurances, unemployment benefits and pensions. This puts the entire cost of illness, care giving or financial setbacks to individuals yet the business gains access to a just-in-time, low-commitment workforce.
Power Imbalances and Hidden Pressures
Although flexible jobs appear to offer control over schedules, in reality platforms and employers often dictate when work is available and what rates are paid. The employees might be forced to take low paid shifts, to work long hours or unsafe hours, or to be constantly available to ensure that ratings are maintained to gain entry to future work. Single workers can do little to challenge unfair deactivation, wage reductions or poor algorithms without collective bargaining power or explicit grievance procedures. Psychological cost of hours and ratings being the constant goal is as harmful as economic instability.
Read also: Flexible Work Hours vs. Remote Work: Which Policy Supports Better Work Life Balance?
Who Bears the Brunt of Instability?
Females, migrants, and low-income laborers are overrepresented in the flexible and low-protecting jobs including household work, transport, ride-working, and online micro-jobs. To them, being flexible is not a luxury of life, but rather a necessity as they often have no avenue to some form of stable jobs, training, and promotion. This instills inequalities, since those who are already marginalized become forced into the least secure kinds of employment with no safety nets or bargaining power.
Toward Fair and Secure Flexibility
In order to make flexibility work with workers, not only employers, it is important to set a number of reforms:
- Reclassifying or securing platform and gig workers in a manner that they have minimum wage guarantees, social security payments, and paid leaves.
- Establishing explicit regulations regarding algorithms, schedule, and deactivation decisions, and the right to appeal.
- Promoting the collective representation in sets of workers, worker associations, or platform councils to bargain the fair pay and conditions.
- Escalating portable benefit systems that track employees across multiple part times or gig jobs, with an extension of health and retirement benefits.
