Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Lawsuit Under Review by US Supreme Court

WhatsAppWhatsAppFacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterPinterestPinterestRedditRedditGmailGmailShareShare

On Thursday, the US Supreme Court heard arguments in a high profile case challenging former President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship. The policy, issued on Trump’s first day in office this January, calls for children born on American soil to be denied U.S. citizenship unless at least one parent is a citizen or lawful permanent resident.

A Legal Battle with Constitutional Stakes

The case, the first of Trump’s second term to be considered by the court, involves the Citizenship Clause of the 14th amendment, which has always been interpreted to mean that almost everyone born in the United States is a citizen. If the order takes effect, there could be more than 150,000 newborns affected each year.

Read Also: US Appeals Court Limits Key Provision of Voting Rights Act 

Although the Court is not yet deciding whether the order is unconstitutional, it is taking up emergency petitions to vacate nationwide injunctions issued by federal judges in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. Trump’s lawyers have argued that these universal injunctions are judicial overreach and should be limited or vacated.

The conservative justices hinted at a desire to change the reach of such injunctions through other possibilities, including class-action lawsuits, but both liberal and conservative justices did not disagree on the uncertain practical implications of Trump’s order, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh asking, “What do hospitals do with a newborn?”

Justice Sonia Sotomayor warned that the policy could make children stateless, while Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson denounced the government for implementing a policy that promotes unconstitutional action until someone sues it.

The plaintiffs 22 states and immigrant rights groups argue that the policy violates 100 years of precedent from the Wong Kim Ark decision from 1898. The Court is expected to issue a ruling by the end of June and the outcome could redefine citizenship rights and the scope of judicial authority in the U.S.

About Shamini

I’m Shamini, a writer who enjoys exploring and explaining current events. I provide detailed insights and fresh perspectives on various topics, helping readers understand the stories that matter most.

Shamini

I’m Shamini, a writer who enjoys exploring and explaining current events. I provide detailed insights and fresh perspectives on various topics, helping readers understand the stories that matter most.

Recent Posts

DA Hike 2025: Central Govt Employees & Pensioners Likely to Get 3-4% Increase Soon

Central government employees and pensioners in India are anxiously anticipating a likely dearness allowance (DA) hike of 3-4% in July…

July 22, 2025

UK Workers Born Before 1965 May Stop Paying National Insurance – Here’s What the Petition Says

There is a growing UK Parliamentary petition asking the government to abolish National Insurance (NI) contributions for workers born in…

July 22, 2025

How Will the No Tax on Tips Act Impact Restaurant and Service Workers?

Restaurant and service workers all over the U.S. may see a welcome boost to their take home pay because of…

July 22, 2025

Andhra Pradesh Power Workers Protest for Pay Hike and Job Security – Find Out Which Staff Seek Raises

In Vijayawada, thousands of electricity workers from across the state of Andhra Pradesh protested and demanded overdue pay increases, job…

July 22, 2025

New Zealand Offers the Best Work Life Balance: A Complete Guide to Visa Options

New Zealand regularly ranks at the top of the work life balance list, being voted No.1 for three years in…

July 21, 2025

Turkish Nationals Can Now Get 5-Year Schengen Visas – Everything You Need to Know

In a historic development that will ease travel to Europe, Turkish citizens now receive multi-entry Schengen visas for five years,…

July 21, 2025