Productivity Targets vs Worker Safety: A Dangerous Trade-Off

Across factories, warehouses, construction sites, and delivery networks, productivity targets are increasingly shaping how work gets done—and how quickly. But safety advocates warn that when speed and output become the main measures of performance, worker safety can slip from a requirement to an afterthought. Reports from labour groups describe situations where strict quotas encourage rushed processes, skipped checks, and longer hours, raising the risk of accidents and chronic injuries. Employers respond to this by saying that targets facilitate business competitiveness and may co-exist with high protections. It has now been a question of whether the current incentives are safe work that is rewarded or punished.

How Productivity Targets Can Raise Risk

Experts say productivity targets become dangerous when they are unrealistic, poorly monitored, or tied to pay and job security. Piece-rate systems, pick rates per hour, or even expectations of no downtime may place pressure to work faster than safe processes would permit. In high-risk environments, small shortcuts add up: missing protective equipment, bypassing machine guards, rushing vehicle loading, or ignoring fatigue.

Safety officers also allege that underreporting of injuries may increase where workplaces consider it as a failure performance. Employees are likely to withhold reports on near-misses or minor injuries in case they lose bonus, shifts, and subsequent contracts.

Read more: 12 Countries With The Worst Work-Life Balance In 2025: What They Get Wrong About Productivity

The Real-World Safety Gaps Workers Describe

The most common accounts on workers are:

• Long working hours and over time when there is high demand.
• Limited break time or break denial to meet quotas
• Recruits that were assigned to work on tasks at a high speed rate were not well trained.
• Delay in maintaining equipment to prevent production downtimes.
• Managers who place less emphasis on risk reporting.

These problems frequently become acute in the conditions of subcontracting, as the responsibility may be divided between a major corporation and several contractors.

Why Employers Defend Targets

Many businesses argue that productivity targets are standard management tools that improve planning, reduce waste, and ensure customer deadlines. According to some companies, their systems have safety, so-called, stop rules, regular audits, and hazard reporting incentives.

It is also pointed out by industry groups that delays, rework and accidents are expensive. In principle, they argue, worker safety and productivity should reinforce each other when processes are well designed.

What a Safer Balance Looks Like

Labour experts recommend redesigning incentives so worker safety is measurable and rewarded. Practical steps include setting targets based on time-and-motion studies, adjusting quotas for heat, night shifts, and staffing levels, and empowering workers to pause unsafe work without penalty.

Pressure to compromise speed with safety in supply chains can also be addressed by stronger inspection regimes, open reporting of incidents, and risk sharing among supply chains. Ultimately, the goal is simple: productivity targets should drive smarter work—not riskier work.

Disclaimer: Stay informed on human rights and the real stories behind laws and global decisions. Follow updates on labour rights and everyday workplace realities. Learn about the experiences of migrant workers, and explore thoughtful conversations on work-life balance and fair, humane ways of working.