The ITUC 2025 Index crisis paints a stark picture of the global state of workers’ rights. According to the index, 87% of countries now restrict or block the right to strike, while 80% undermine or crush collective bargaining. What once seemed like established labour protections are eroding even in regions that long presented themselves as defenders of democracy and social dialogue. Europe and the Americas, which have been viewed as comparatively safer regions to enact unions, have reached new all-time lows in the ITUC 2025 Index. The data suggests that decades of neoliberal reforms—privatisation, deregulation, and weakened unions—are backfiring, fuelling inequality, insecurity, and social unrest.
The ITUC 2025 Index crisis highlights a broad rollback of the right to strike across authoritarian and democratic systems alike. Governments are turning to the use of emergency laws, essential-services category and brutal policing to limit industrial action.
At the same time, employers and policymakers are hollowing out collective bargaining through outsourcing, gig work, and individualised employment contracts. When 80 percent of nations squash bargaining, employees are denied an important tool to obtain good pay, safe workplace and a foreseeable working schedule.
One of the most fearful results of the ITUC 2025 Index is the sharp fall in Europe and the Americas. The austerity policies, liberalisation of the labour market and anti-union political campaigning have undermined collective institutions that previously provided the middle-class with stability.
Wage freezes in the public sector, inhibition of union organisation as well as assaults on sector agreements has become widespread in most countries. The flexibility and competitiveness that neoliberalism has purported to offer have in many cases, led to stagnant wages, precarity in employment and an increasing level of frustration among workers who perceive themselves as having been shut out of economic benefits.
The ITUC 2025 Index crisis shows how weakening labour rights can undermine both economic and democratic resilience. Suppressing strikes and collective bargaining may temporarily lower labour costs, but it also fuels inequality, depresses demand, and heightens political volatility.
The restoration of the right to organise and collectively bargain is not merely a social justice requirement; it is also a macroeconomic and democratic requirement. Stronger unions, inclusive bargaining structures, and legal protections for strikes can help distribute productivity gains, support decent jobs, and restore faith in democratic institutions shaken by decades of neoliberal backfire.
One of the biggest components of the modern UK workforce is no-hour contracts. The Zero-Hour Contract model provides flexibility to…
The issues of equality in the workplace have taken a conclusive turn when the Karnataka High Court instructed that the…
A dramatic hunger strike outside the New York City Hall occurred as the immigrant home care workers made a desperate…
The announcement of the Salary Hike in Uttar Pradesh has become a national topic of concern, particularly following the protests…
Beginning today, there is a significant change in law regarding hiring that is altering how companies are considering job applicants.…
The Noida Sector 63 Raids have led to a huge crackdown on labour law in Noida, which revealed appalling labour…
This website uses cookies.
Read More