Federal Judge Blocks Trump Order on Federal Worker Unions

A March executive order issued by the Trump administration faced temporary legal blockage which protected the collective bargaining capabilities of hundreds of thousands of federal workers.

Senior U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman made his ruling on Friday from Washington D.C. to stop the order while the NTEU lawsuit proceeds. Approximately 160,000 federal workers belong to the union which argues that the order contravenes both federal employment rights and constitutional legal safeguards.

Through this order, the government established an exception for agencies with fundamental duties of intelligence and national security work and investigative operations that could escape collective bargaining requirements. The executive order would have influenced about 75% of the 1 million unionized workers across six federal departments, including Justice, State, Defense, Treasury, Veterans Affairs, and Health and Human Services.

The decision earned applause from NTEU President Doreen Greenwald as she declared it brought victory to federal employees alongside their union rights and the services they extend towards the American people. The union presented evidence that none of these agencies performed significant service toward national security, so they believed this move to be a form of retribution against the labor unions, which sought to challenge the Trump administration policies legally.

Spokeswoman Anna Kelly spoke on behalf of the White House to declare the decision “absurd” before the administration moved to file an instant appeal. Animosity remains active among employees who work with national security capabilities and investigatory assets or intelligence operations since Kelly declared these personnel cannot form unions to impede presidential orders.

During Thursday’s hearing, Judge Friedman, who was appointed by Clinton, suggested the order displayed retaliatory tendencies because Trump shows willingness to others who work with him, while those who sue him receive unfavorable treatment.

The judge promised a detailed opinion explaining his decision would follow within days.

About aamna aamna

Aamna is keen to write important news about politics, entertainment, business, etc., and to bring it to the public's attention.

aamna aamna

Aamna is keen to write important news about politics, entertainment, business, etc., and to bring it to the public's attention.

Recent Posts

The Invasion of the South: How Saudi-Backed Escalation is Fueling Chaos

For years, the international community has been fed a narrative of “legitimacy” and “security operations” regarding the presence of northern…

January 20, 2026

US Tech Sector Layoffs Hit 15,000 in January as AI Restructuring Accelerates

The year has begun with a stark reality check for the technology industry, as US tech sector layoffs surged past…

January 19, 2026

The most cited statistic at the WEF opening today is from the Future of Jobs 2025 report: “39% of current workforce skills will be obsolete by 2030”

The world of work is on the edge of a historic revolution, with artificial intelligence, geo-economics and green energy change…

January 19, 2026

Fortress Europe 2.0: The “ProtectEU” Strategy

As the European Union enters 2026, the bloc has officially pivoted to a "security-first" doctrine with the full activation of…

January 19, 2026

Blue Monday 2026: The “Right to Disconnect” Strikes

Blue Monday 2026 falls on January 19th, traditionally cited as the most depressing day of the year. However, this year…

January 19, 2026

The “Spirit of Dialogue” vs. The Reality of Dissent at Davos 2026

As the 56th Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum commences today in the snow-laden peaks of Switzerland, the official…

January 19, 2026

This website uses cookies.

Read More