Enforcement Paused: U.S. Judge Blocks Oklahoma Immigration Crackdown

WhatsAppWhatsAppFacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterPinterestPinterestRedditRedditGmailGmailShareShare

In a significant legal action, a federal judge temporarily prevented Oklahoma from enforcing a new immigration law that imposes criminal penalties on undocumented migrants. U.S. District Judge Bernard Jones ruled that the law, HB 4156 will be paused for at least 14 days while a court challenge unfolds on Tuesday citing concerns that it Likely encroaches on the federal government’s exclusive control over immigration matters.

Read Also : Immigration Crackdown Begins in Los Angeles Amid Nationwide Sweep

Key Provisions of Oklahoma Immigration Law HB 4156

This controversial law permits state and local police to arrest someone believed to be in the U.S. illegally. Additionally, under HB 4156, a first offense is a misdemeanor offense with a potential punishment of a year in jail and a fine of $500; a second offense is a felony with a possible punishment of two years in prison. Finally anyone convicted and released after being detained must vacate the State within 72 hours.

The ACLU, which represented Padres Unidos de Tulsa and several individual plaintiffs, characterized the decision as a “victory for Oklahoma’s immigrant community” and expressed optimism that the law would be struck down in the end.

Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond called the ruling “outrageous” and argued the ruling undermines the state’s ability to tackle drug trafficking and other crimes associated with illegal immigration.

The U.S. Department of Justice previously challenged the law under President Biden who contended that it violated the Constitution by encroaching on exclusive powers of the federal government to implement immigration enforcement. The DOJ subsequently dismissed the case after President Trump returned to the White House but Judge Jones made it clear that the change in administration does not change the central point which is that immigration enforcement is a federal, not a state issue.

A hearing for a potential permanent injunction is set for early June.

About Shamini

I’m Shamini, a writer who enjoys exploring and explaining current events. I provide detailed insights and fresh perspectives on various topics, helping readers understand the stories that matter most.

Shamini

I’m Shamini, a writer who enjoys exploring and explaining current events. I provide detailed insights and fresh perspectives on various topics, helping readers understand the stories that matter most.

Recent Posts

Philippines Updates Entry Rules: Visa Free Access for Taiwan Tourists – Eligibility, Duration & Start Date

According to the Philippine government, beginning July 1, 2025, travelers from Taiwan holding a passport will be permitted to enter…

June 21, 2025

Yoga Day 2025: 5 Easy Desk Yoga Stretches to Beat Stress and Boost Focus at Work

Balancing work and life can be chaotic and sitting at a desk for hours builds tension in your neck, shoulders…

June 21, 2025

8th Pay Commission: How Much Will Your Salary, Pension, HRA & TA Increase in 2026?

The 8th Pay Commission has been approved by the cabinet and is likely expected to come into effect on January…

June 21, 2025

Massive Layoff at Voice of America: 639 More Terminated as Parent Agency Slashes 85% of Staff

In a bold move indicating the possible end of an iconic U.S. broadcasting entity, the U.S. Agency for Global Media…

June 21, 2025

Malaysia Steps Up Fight Against Forced Labour – Inside the 2025 Plan

With the help of the International Labour Organisation (ILO), Malaysia is increasing its commitments to eliminate forced labour with the…

June 20, 2025

Canada’s 2025 Job Outlook: 10 Careers in High Demand for Global Workers

Canada’s labour market is changing quickly due to an ageing population, economic changes and digital advancements. Because of this, some…

June 20, 2025