Louise Haigh Case Highlights Looming Recruitment Challenges

WhatsAppWhatsAppFacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterPinterestPinterestRedditRedditGmailGmailShareShare

The Employment Rights Bill presented by the Labour Party is likely to revolutionise employment in the UK and employers are concerned that the changes will create unfavourable consequences that may reduce their willingness to offer employment. The new law to improve worker rights that have been supported by Angela Rayner is seen by private sector managers as a threat that will expose them to new risks while recruiting employees and cost them more money. Again, the measures contained in the bill, alongside potential changes to National Insurance contributions, are likely to revolutionise the process of staff acquisition throughout British organisations.

With the recent resignation of Louise Haigh having been linked to revelations about a historic fraud offence, workplace accountability has turned out to be a main concentrate in discussions. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch used it to cast aspersions on the vetting of Sir Keir Starmer, and the dangers employers put themselves in when hiring. It also raises a question about the heightened involvement of recruitment in the present and ever more restrictive employment regime.

Keep Reading


The combinations of these reforms are of great concern to the employers as the following consequences are likely to ensue. Employees’ rights such as ensuring that the staff cannot be dismissed unlawfully from their first day at work and the expansion of paternity and sick pay are enshrined in the Employment Rights Bill at the same time as huge rises in National Insurance employer costs – could be a difficult proposition for businesses.

As the government encourages the proper integration of individuals with past criminal records into society, particularly employment status, private industry executives have been growing more careful. This is because the proposed £25bn tax increase on employer National Insurance contributions together with the extension of workers’ rights may well stifle recruitment and create a more risk-oversee attitude towards employment.

Many employers accept that there is a requirement for modernised labour laws, which is why, as it is now, the UK ranks comparatively low among wealthy countries in terms of employment rights. However, they worry that the overall integration of extensive legislative measures and substantial financial effects would drastically alter the hiring patterns and practically restrict candidate choices.


writer ss

Recent Posts

UK Government Unveils Pension Reform: Workers Could Gain GBP 6,000 Boost by 2030

The United Kingdom government has declared considerable reform on pensions that could boost retirement savings of workers by GBP 6,000…

May 29, 2025

Japan to Hire 100,000 Bangladeshi Workers by 2029: A New Horizon for Job Seekers

Japan plans to hire at least 100,000 workers from Bangladesh in the next five years to combat labour shortages. The…

May 29, 2025

Chevron Sets July 15 for 800 Job Cuts in Texas as Part of Global Downsizing

Chevron Corporation announced an approximate 800 jobs cut in Midland County, Texas, effective July 15, 2025.  This layoff announcement is…

May 29, 2025

World Employment Outlook 2025: 7 Million Jobs Lost to Slowing Growth and Trade Tensions

The International Labour Organization (ILO) has drastically reduced the global employment estimate for 2025 again, from previously estimating 60 million…

May 29, 2025

ISRO Scientist/Engineer 2025 Recruitment: 320 Vacancies, Eligibility, Fees & How to Apply

The Indian space research organisation ISRO has undertaken a major recruitment drive due in 2025. Applications were invited for a…

May 28, 2025

Czech Flexi-Amendment 2025: Major Labor Law Reforms Take Effect June 1 – Know the Key Changes

The Czech Republic will introduce the "Flexi-Amendment" on June 1, 2025. The Flexi-Amendment is a wide-ranging overhaul to the Labour…

May 28, 2025